Berkeley claims that only fundamental properties are independent of my perception True.
The obvious counter-argument that the same facts about the "relativity" of our perception of "primary" qualities show that they do not "resemble" anything found in the objects and that, as a result, both "primary" and "secondary" qualities exist solely "in the mind" is credited to Berkeley.
He claimed that the arguments Locke believed were sufficient to demonstrate that some characteristics were 'in the mind' were actually sufficient to demonstrate that all attributes were equivalent in this regard. To put it another way, Berkeley disapproved of the division Locke made between primary and secondary-qualities.
To Know more about perception
https://brainly.com/question/27164706
#SPJ4
